THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. ASERA SOFTWARE(INDIA)PVT., LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the tax effect in the present appeal was below the enhanced monetary limit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in accordance with the CBDT circular.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued a circular enhancing the monetary limit for filing appeals to the High Court from Rs. 10 lacs to Rs. 20 lacs.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable given the revised monetary limits for filing appeals as per the CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
ITA No. 209/2011
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -11(1), C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. …APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND & MS.PREETHI.J.D– ADVs)
AND
ASERA SOFTWARE (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NO.14, VIJETA, 2ND FLOOR, 80 FT., MAIN ROAD, 4TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA , BANGALORE-560 034. ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.K.K.CHYTHANYA-ADV)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.1179/BANG/2009 DATED: 11.2.2011, ETC.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue has placed before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes, wherein the monetary limit of the tax effect for filing appeals before the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to Rs.20 lacs. In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has been clarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pending appeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may be withdrawn/not pressed.
Learned counsel for the appellants has stated that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the specified limit of Rs.20 lacs.
Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in this appeal being less than Rs.20 lacs, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE TL
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026