THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SHRI MUNINAGA REDDY,

PDF · subscribers
ITA/216/2015HC KarnatakaKAHC01031892201517 December 2015Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court dismissed the appeal. This was done in accordance with a CBDT circular that increased the monetary limit for filing appeals to the High Court. The appeal's tax effect was below this new limit.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court. The tax effect in the appeal was found to be below the enhanced monetary limit for filing appeals. This enhancement was based on a CBDT circular.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be dismissed due to the tax effect being below the revised monetary limit specified in a CBDT circular.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

AND

THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA

ITA No. 216/2015

BETWEEN

1.

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX , C.R. BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.

2.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -6(1), RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.

...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. K.V.ARAVIND & MS. PREETHI-J.D.-ADVs)

AND

SHRI. MUNINAGA REDDY, NO.45, 3RD B MAIN, 4TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGLAORE-560 043, PAN:AFLPR 5736F.

... RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. S.PARTHASARATHI & MS. JINITA CHATTERJEE-ADVs)

THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO. 860/BANG/2012 DATED: 13.1.2015, ETC.,

THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue has placed before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes, wherein the monetary limit of the tax effect for filing appeals before the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to Rs.20 lacs. In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has been clarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pending appeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may be withdrawn/not pressed.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellants has stated that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the specified limit of Rs.20 lacs.

3.

Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in this appeal being less than Rs.20 lacs, the appeal stands dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE TL

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →