THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI. MAHATMA BASAVESHWAR CREDIT
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court disposed of the appeal in similar terms as the previous case. The Revenue was granted liberty to revive the appeal if they succeeded in a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court on the same subject matter.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the ITAT. The Revenue submitted that this appeal was covered by a previous decision of the High Court in another appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the current appeal is covered by a previous High Court decision and the conditions for reviving the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.BILLAPPA AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR I.T.A.No.100022/2016 BETWEEN: 1. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BELAGAVI. 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NIPANI, DIST:BELAGAVI. … APPELLANTS (BY SHRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.) AND: SHRI MAHATMA BASAVESHWAR CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI LIMITED, CHIKKODI ROAD, NIPANI, DIST:BELAGAVI, PAN:AAAAS 2281 C. … RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE
: 2 : TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.317/PNJ/2015, DTD:14.09.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NIPANI AND ETC., THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Sri Y.V.Raviraj, the learned standing counsel for the Revenue submits that this appeal is covered by the decision of this Court in I.T.A.No.100080/2015 disposed of on 06.01.2016 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. The Belgaum Taluka Rural Industrial Co-operative Society Ltd.). 2. I.T.A.No.100080/2015 is disposed with liberty to the Revenue to revive the said appeal in the event, Revenue succeeded in the Special Leave Petition filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court on subject matter in issue.
: 3 : 3. This appeal also stands disposed of in the like terms contained in I.T.A.No.100080/2015 with liberty to revive, as granted in the said appeal. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Jm/-
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026