THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE HUBLI URBAN CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that a Co-operative Bank was not required to deduct tax on interest paid on Time Deposits to its members before June 1, 2015. This decision was based on a previous High Court judgment and a circular from the Ministry of Finance.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed a tribunal's decision that a Co-operative Bank was not required to deduct tax on interest paid to its members. This exemption was based on Section 194A(3)(v) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether a Co-operative Bank is exempt from deducting tax on interest paid to its members on Time Deposits, and the applicability of Section 194A(3)(v) in this regard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK B.HINCHIGERI A N D THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR I.T.A. NO.481/2015 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS, C R BUIDLING NAVANAGAR, HUBLI 580025 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) 3RD FLOOR, C R BUILDING ANNEXE, NAVANAGAR, HUBLI 580025. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE) AND : THE HUBLI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., GF, URBAN BANK BUILDING 1 SIR SIDDAPP KAMBLI ROAD HUBLI 580020, PAN: AAAAH 0120P. ... RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS DATED 20.3.2015, PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX
: 2 : APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE, IN ITA NO.1192/BANG/2014, CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), HUBLI, ETC.,. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Revenue, with a question of law as to whether Tribunal was correct in holding that a Co-operative Bank was not required to deduct tax on the interest paid to the members on the ground that they were exempt under Section 194A(3)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) has presented this appeal. A Division Bench of this Court in I.T.A. No.100180/2015 vide its judgment dated 17.08.2016 by placing reliance on the circular bearing No.19/2015 in F. No.142/14/2015 TPL issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, has held that the Co-operative Bank was not required to deduct tax from the payment of interest on Time Deposits of its members paid or credited on or before 01.06.2015. The relevant portion of the circular reads as follows : “42.5 In view of this, the provisions of the section 194(3)(v) of the Income-tax Act have been amended so as to expressly provide that
: 3 : the exemption provided from deduction of tax from payment of interest to members by a co- operative society under Section 194A(3)(v) of the Income-tax Act shall not apply to the payment of interest on time deposits by the co-operative banks to its members. As this amendment is effective from the prospective date of 1st June, 2015, the co-operative bank shall be required to deduct tax from the payment of interest on time deposits of its members, on or after the 1st June 2015. Hence, a cooperative bank was not required to deduct tax from the payment of interest on time deposits of its members paid or credited before 1st June 2015.” 2. The grievance of the revenue is with regard to a finding recorded by the Tribunal that the Co-operative Banks were never required to deduct tax on the interest paid. The said issue is no more res integra and settled in the aforementioned judgment dated 17.8.2016 in ITA No.100180/2015. Therefore, this appeal fails and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE hnm
More judgments on Section 194A(3)(v)
- The Vijapur Taluka Co-Operative Purchase… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, PatanITA 925/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- ITO(TDS)-1(2)(1), Mumbai vs Dattatray Maharaj Kalambe Jaoli Sah. Bank…ITA 7429/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- ITO (TDS)-1(2)(1), Mumbai vs Dattatray Maharaj Kalambe Jaoli Sah. Bank…ITA 7428/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ITO (TDS)-1(2)(1), Mumbai vs Dattatray Maharaj Kalambe Jaoli Sah. Bank…ITA 7427/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ITO (TDS)-1(2)(1), Mumbai vs Dattatray Maharaj Kalambe Jaoli Sah. Bank…ITA 7426/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ramshrayashil Constructions PVT.LTD vs. Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Government Of INDIAJharkhand · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Kiea Corporate Business Solutions vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Vrajman Enterprises vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 2 Nov 2026
- Nimmakayala Padmavathi vs. The Union Of INDIAAndhra Pradesh · 2 Nov 2026
- Som Nath Nagar Mal Th Partner Sanjay Mahajan vs. Union Of INDIA Th Department Of Financial Services, Ministry Of Finance And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 2 Nov 2026