THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE NAGARBAIL SALT-OWNERS
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court followed its previous judgment in a related case and dismissed the appeal. The society was not entitled to claim exemption for profits paid to its members as expenditure.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the ITAT's order concerning the assessment year 2007-08. The core issue was whether the respondent society could claim exemption for profits paid to its members as expenditure before offering profits for tax.
What were the issues?
Whether profits paid by a co-operative society to its members can be claimed as expenditure for tax exemption purposes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B.HINCHIGERI AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR I.T.A.NO.100069/2015 BETWEEN 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING ATTAVAR, MANGALURU 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2,SANTERI KRUJAPA BUILDING HABBUWADA, KARWAR ... APPELANTS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE) AND THE NAGARBAIL SALT-OWNERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED SANIKATTE, GOKARNA, KUMTA-581 326 PAN: AAAFT6229J ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI ASHOK KULKARNI & SRI H R KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATES) THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE
2 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.252/PNJ/2014, DTD: 23.01.2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SANTERI KRUJAPA BUILDING, HABBUWAD, KARWAR. THIS ITA HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR. J., PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:- JUDGMENT This appeal was presented by the Revenue challenging the common order dated 23.1.2015, in I.T.A.Nos.252 to 256 & 377/PNJ/2014 so far as it relates to ITA 252/PNJ/2014 for the assessment year 2007-08. 2. The learned standing Counsel for the Revenue and the learned Counsel for the assessee were heard on the following substantial question of law: “Whether the respondent – Society assessed to tax on its income as ‘person’ as defined under Section 2(31) of Income Tax Act, 1961, is entitled to claim exemption over its profits paid to its members and claim it as
3 expenditure in the accounts before offering the profit for tax?” 3. By a detailed order of even date, this Court has dismissed I.T.A.No.100067/2015 for the assessment year 2006-07. Following the said judgment, this appeal is also dismissed without any order as to costs. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Yn.
More judgments on Section 2(31)
- Sharadamma, Hassan vs The Income Tax Officer Ward-1, HassanITA 208/BANG/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Income Tax Officer 20(1)(1), Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Private Equity Sunrise Fund…ITA 4742/MUM/2026[2016]Status: Disposed26 Aug 2026
- Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies… vs Income Tax Officer (TDS), Ward-1…ITA 169/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 May 2026AY 2019-20
- Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies… vs Income Tax Officer (TDS), Ward-1, EluruITA 168/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 May 2026AY 2019-20
- Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies… vs Income Tax Officer (TDS), Ward-1…ITA 167/VIZ/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 May 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026