PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)- 1, vs. M/S ADAMINE CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,
What did the High Court hold?
The tribunal held that the AO failed to conduct necessary enquiries, such as into bank accounts, and relied solely on reports which were not primary material. The assessee had discharged its initial onus by providing basic details.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) added ₹9,30,00,000 as unexplained investment under Section 68 based on a third-party search. The amounts were received from seven entities, and the AO relied on reports from the Commissioner at Mumbai and Kolkata.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO made adequate enquiries before adding amounts under Section 68 based on third-party search reports, and if the assessee discharged its onus.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 171/2018
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)- 1
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar & Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Standing Counsels for Revenue.
versus
M/S ADAMINE CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
O R D E R %
12.02.2018
The Assessing Officer in this case had – based upon the search conducted in the premises of a third party, issued re-assessment and proceeded to add `9,30,00,000/- as unexplained investment under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as “the Act”). The amounts received were from 7 entities and the AO sought report from the Commissioner at Mumbai and Kolkata. The CIT(A) and the ITAT concurrently deleted the amounts brought to tax under Section 68 of the Act, holding that the relevant enquiry based upon the materials furnished by the assessee had not been made.
We notice that the search in the premises of the Bhushan Steel Group, had led to survey in the premises of various other assessees including M/s Adamine Construction Pvt. Ltd., and in ITA No.171/2018
Page 1 of 2
the end the additions made in that case too were deleted. The deletion – again concurrently by the lower appellate authorities was upheld by this Court recently in respect of the same assessee for an earlier assessment. Here too, the Court has considered the materials. What is evident is that the AO went by only the report received and did not make the necessary further enquiries – such as into the bank accounts or other particulars available with him but rather received the entire findings on the report, which cannot be considered as primary material. The assessee had discharged the onus initially cast upon it by providing the basic details which were not suitably enquired into by the AO.
No question of law arises; the appeal is consequently dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J FEBRUARY 12, 2018 kks
ITA No.171/2018
Page 2 of 2
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026