THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S V S LAD and SONS
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the Revenue's application to withdraw the appeals. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the High Court against orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had dismissed the Revenue's appeals and allowed the assessee's appeals in multiple cases.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the Revenue's decision to withdraw the appeals before the High Court, leading to their dismissal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, C BENCH,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL
I.T.A.No.100101 OF 2014 C/W I.T.A.Nos.100102, 100105 & 100106 OF 2014
IN ITA No.100101/2014 BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SADUM ROAD, GULBARGA.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(3), BANGALORE. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. TULAJAPPA KALABURAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S V S LAD & SONS, PRASANTH NIVAS, KRISHNA NAGAR, SANDUR – 583119, BELLARY – DISTRICT, PAN:AACFV3909R. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A.SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL & SRI. SHASHANK HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
2 THIS I.T.A. IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 AGAINST ORDER PASSED IN ITA NO.18/BANG/2013 DATED 13.06.2014 ON THE FILE OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AND ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE.
IN ITA No.100102/2014
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SADUM ROAD, GULBARGA.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(3), BANGALORE. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. TULAJAPPA KALABURAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S V S LAD & SONS, PRASANTH NIVAS, KRISHNA NAGAR, SANDUR - 583119 BELLARY DISTRICT PAN:AACFV3909R. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A.SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL & SRI. S.S.HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 AGAINST ORDER PASSED IN ITA NO.145/BANG/2013 DATED 13.06.2014 ON THE FILE OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AND ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE.
3 IN ITA No.100105/2014
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SADUM ROAD, GULBARGA.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), BANGALORE. ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. TULAJAPPA KALABURAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S V S LAD & SONS PRASANTH NIVAS, KRISHNA NAGAR, SANDUR - 583119, BELLARY DISTRICT, PAN: AACFV3909R. ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. A.SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL & SRI. S.S.HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 AGAINST ORDER PASSED IN ITA NO.144/BANG/2013 DATED 13.06.2014 ON THE FILE OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AND ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE.
4 IN ITA No.100106/2014
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SADUM ROAD, GULBARGA.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), BANGALORE. ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. TULAJAPPA KALABURAGI, ADVCOATE)
AND
M/S V S LAD & SONS PRASANTH NIVAS, KIRSHNA NAGAR, SANDUR - 583119, BELLARY DISTRICT PAN: AACFV3909R. ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. A.SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL & SRI. SHASHANK HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 AGAINST ORDER PASSED IN ITA NO.19/BANG/2013 DATED 13.06.2014 ON THE FILE OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AND ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
5 ORDER
Mr.Tulajappa Kalaburagi, learned counsel for the Revenue. 2. Mr.A.Shankar, learned senior counsel and Mr.Shashank S.Hegde, learned counsel for the assessee. 3. In view of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, the learned counsel for the Revenue seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the aforesaid appeals. Accordingly, the aforesaid appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- JUDGE
SD/- JUDGE CLK
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026