THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1 vs. GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA COMPANY
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the ITAT correctly followed the previous ruling of the High Court in the assessee's favor. The appeals were dismissed, subject to the final outcome of pending Supreme Court appeals on the same legal question.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the ITAT's decision regarding interest levied under Section 234-B of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue's appeals were based on the same issue that was decided in favor of the assessee in a previous High Court judgment.
What were the issues?
The key issue was whether the interest levied under Section 234-B was justified, considering a prior High Court judgment on the same matter.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- DIT v. GE Packaged Power Inc.199 citing373 ITR 65 · 2015 · HC
/ $-10 to 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 10 ITA 661/2018 and C.M.Nos.24761-24763/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) Appellant Through: versus GENERAL ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS INC Respondent { Through: 11 ITA 662/2018 and C.M.Nos.24764-24766/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-1 ~ Appellant Through: versus GE ENGINE SERVICES MCALLEN LP Respondent 12 Through: ITA 663/2018 and C.M.Nos.24768-24770/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-1 Appellant Through: versus GE ENGINE SERVICES MCALLEN LP Respondent Through: 13 ITA 664/2018 and C.M.N6S.24771-24773/2018 . THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) Appellant Through: versus GE CALEDONIAN LTD Respondent Through: ITA 661/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of6 y< Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signature Not Verified
14 15 16 17 1 ITA 665/201824774 - 24776/2018 ^THE .GOMMISSIONER OF,INCOME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) Appellant Through; versus GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA COMPANY Respondent, Through: ITA 666/2018 and C.M.Nos.24777^24779/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) . Appellant Through: ' versus ,GE JENBACFIER GMBH & CO. Respondent Through: ITA 667/2018 and C.M.Nos.24780-24782/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL " TAXATION -1 Appellant . Through: versus GE ENGINE SERVICES MCALLEN LP Respondent Through: ITA 668/2018 and C.M.Nos.24783-24785/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) Appellant Through: versus GE CALEDONIAN LTD Respondent Through: ITA 661/2018 & connected matters Page 2 of6 ...
18 19 20 21 ITA 669/2018 and C.M.Nos.24799-24801/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1 Through: versus GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA COMPANY Through: Appellant Respondent ITA 670/2018 and C.M.Nos.24802-24804/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-1 Appellant Through: versus NUOVO PIGNONE SPA Through: ITA 671/2018 and C.M.Nos.24805-24807/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) Through: versus GE JENBACHER GMBH & CO. Through: ITA 672/2018 and C.M.Nos.24810-24812/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) Through: versus GE CALEDONIAN LTD Through: Respondent . Appellant Respondent ... Appellant Respondent ITA 661/2018 & connected matters Page 3 of6
22 23 24 '25 ITA 673/2018 and C.M.Nos.24813^24815/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-! i Through: i versus j. GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA COMPANY Through: | i ' " i 1 • ITA 674/2018 and C.M.Nos.24816^24818/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INdOME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) Through: versus GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA (pOMPANY . : Through: | ITA 675/2018 and C.M.Nos.24819^24821/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIOl^ER OF INCOME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) I Through: | versus i GEJENBACHERGMBH&CO. | Through: ' ITA 676/2018 and C.M.Nos.24822-24824/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INcjoME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ! ^ Through: versus GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA COMPANY Through: Appellant Respondent Appellant Respondent . Appellant Respondent Appellant Respondent. ITA 661/2018 & connected matters Page 4 of6
s 26 ITA 677/2018 aiid C.M.Nos.24826-24828/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) Appellant Through: versus GE WIND ENERGY GMBH Respondent Through: 27 ITA 678/2018 and C.M.Nos.24829-24831/2018 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) Appellant Through: versus GE WIND ENERGY GMBH ' .....Respondent Through: 28 ITA 679/2018 and C.M.Nos.24834-24836/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 Appellant Through: versus GE ENGINE SERVICE DISTRIBUTION LLC . Respondent Through: Present: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate for the Revenue in all the matters. Mr. Sachit Jolly and Mr. Siddharth Joshi, Advocates for 1 respondent in all the matters. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA ORDER % 01.06.2018 ITA 661/2018 & connected matters Page 5 of6 I
• The sole question oflaw urged by the Revenue is with respect to the interest levied under Section 234-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This issue is covered in the assessee's favour and against the Revenue by the judgment of this Court in 'Director ofIncome-Tax (International Taxation) vs. GE Packaged Power Inc. \ (2015) 373 ITR 65 (Delhi). ^ It appears that the Revenue has appealed further to the Supreme Court and that its appeals are pending since leave has been granted. In these circumstances, the Court is of the opinion that the previous ruling in the assessee's case would bind it. The ITAT did not commit any error in following that previous order of this Court. However, it is also clarified that in any event, the parties shall be finally bound on the question of law by the judgment/ruling ofthe Supreme Court in the pending batch of appeals and the special leave petitions. The appeals are consequently dismissed subject to the above observations. S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J A. K. CHAWLA, J JUNE 01, 2018 rc ITA 661/2018 & connected matter.^ Page 6 of6
More judgments on Section 234-B
- Kowlanahalli Ningegowda Somashekar… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(3), BangaloreITA 1045/BANG/2025[2021-13]Status: Disposed12 Feb 2026AY 2021-13
- Kairali Bhavan Restaurant, Mangaluru vs DCIT, Central Circle-2, Mangalore, MangaluruITA 1599/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed12 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
- Hotel Residency Park, Mangalore vs DCIT, Central Circle-2, MangaloreITA 1573/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed12 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
- Jaikusuma Balakrishna Shetty, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(2), BangaloreITA 1096/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 Aug 2025AY 2016-17
- M/S. Ing Vysya Bank Employees Co-Operative… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(1), BengaluruITA 330/BANG/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed17 Jun 2025AY 2011-12
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026