COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY

PDF · subscribers
ITA/277/2016HC DelhiDLHC01120541201601 October 2018Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR2 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The Delhi High Court held that the maintenance charges/franchisee fee received by the assessee from satellite schools is exempted under Section 11(4A) of the Income Tax Act. The court found the income was not hit by the provisions of Section 11(4A).

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision concerning maintenance charges and franchisee fees received by Delhi Public School Society. The appeals covered multiple assessment years.

What were the issues?

Whether maintenance charges and franchisee fees received by the assessee are exempted under Section 11(4A) of the Income Tax Act, and if the income is hit by the provisions of Section 11(4A).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 11(4A)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

$-14, 15, 16 and 17. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 261/2013 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY Respondent Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Arta Trana Panda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advocates. ITA 326/2013 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Ms. Vibhooti, Advocates. versus THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY Respondent Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Arta Trana Panda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advocates. ITA 277/2016 and 278/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel. Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Ms. Vibhooti, Advocates, versus THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY Respondent Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Arta Trana Panda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advocates. CORAM: Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:09.10.2024 15:41 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER % 01.10.2018 The aforesaid caption appeals by the Revenue in the case of Delhi Public School Society in ITA Nos. 261/2013, 326/2013, 277/2016 and 278/2016 relate to the Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10, 2006-07 and 2007-08 respectively. These appeals have been admitted for hearing on the following two substantial questions of law. "Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that maintenance charges/franchisee fee received by the respondent assessee from satellite schools is exempted under Section 11(4A) of the Income Tax Act 1961? Whether the income received by the assessee is hit by the provisions of Section 11 (4A) of the Income Tax Act 1961?" Counsel for the parties state and accept that the aforesaid questions of law have to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue in light of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Director of Income Tax (Exemption) versus Delhi Public School Society, (2018) 403 ITR 49 (Delhi). Ordered accordingly. Recording the aforesaid, the appeals are disposed of without any order as to costs. OCTOBER 01, 2018/MR - 7/ SANJIV KHANNA, J. CHANDK^HEKHAR, J.

More judgments on Section 11(4A)

All 280 judgments and leading authorities on Section 11(4A) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →