JCIT(OSD) CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI vs. INDIAN BANK, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, following its own precedents and those of other High Courts. It ruled that bad debts written off relating to non-rural advances do not need to be adjusted against provisions for bad and doubtful debts made under Section 36(1)(viia).
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order allowing the assessee bank's claim for deduction of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had disallowed this deduction, arguing that the write-off was less than the provision made.
What were the issues?
Whether bad debts written off for non-rural advances need to be adjusted against provisions for bad and doubtful debts made under Section 36(1)(viia). Whether the deduction for bad debts is allowable irrespective of the provision made.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Vijaya Bank v. CIT392 citing323 ITR 166 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. CIT326 citing18 Taxmann.com 282 · 2012 · SC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Uttarbanga Kshetriya Gramina Bank13 citing408 ITR 393 · 2018 · HC
- PCIT v. Uttarbanga11 citing94 Taxmann.com 90 · 2018
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEYAND
PER AMITABH SHUKLA, A.M : These four appeals are filed by the revenue against the order bearing DIN & Order No.ITBA / NFAC / S /250 / 2022-23 / 1048327954(1), No.ITBA / NFAC / S /250 / 2022-23 / 1048320600(1), No.ITBA / NFAC / S / 250 / 2022-23/1048323698(1) and No.ITBA / NFAC / S / 250 / 2022-23/1048321468(1), dated 29.12.2022 of the Learned Commission
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(vii)
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- ITO-41.3.4, Mumbai vs Urmila Syntex, MumbaiITA 2458/MUM/2026[2013]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026
- Dar Housing Limited, Nct of Delhi vs DCIT Central Circle- 15, DelhiITA 1881/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Small Industries Development Bank of India…ITA 870/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Small Industries Development Bank of India… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 9170/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026