THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 vs. GE CANADA COMPANY
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court disposed of the appeal in terms of a previous order, stating that the ruling of the Supreme Court in the pending case would apply to the present appeal. Parties can approach the court after the Supreme Court's decision.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed a decision concerning the levy of interest under Section 234B. The High Court noted that a similar issue was decided in a previous case, GE Packaged Power Inc., which is pending before the Supreme Court.
What were the issues?
The key issue was the levy of interest under Section 234B. The appeal was disposed of pending a Supreme Court decision on a similar matter.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 234B,Section 158A,Section 158AA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- DIT v. GE Packaged Power Inc.199 citing373 ITR 65 · 2015 · HC
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 1185/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
versus
GE CANADA COMPANY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Garg and Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R %
02.11.2018 CM No. 45412/2018
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CM No. 45413/2018 Delay in refiling is not opposed by the respondent-assessee. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is allowed. ITA 1185/2018 Counsel for the parties state that the present appeal may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 01.06.2018 passed in ITA No. 661/2018, The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 (International Taxation) vs. General Electric Power Systems INC. It is stated that this would be in consonance with Sections 158A and 158AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, though these
provisions are not strictly applicable. 2. The question raised by the Revenue in these appeals relates to levy of interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which issue is covered against them vide the judgment of this Court in Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) vs. GE Packaged Power Inc., (2015) 373 ITR 65 (Delhi). 3. The appeal against the said decision is pending before the Supreme Court as special leave to appeal has been granted. 4. Counsel for the parties state that the ruling by the Supreme Court would equally apply to the present appeal. Recording the above, the appeal is disposed of. 5. In case of any difficulty, it will be open to the parties to file an application in this appeal after the decision of the Supreme Court.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J. NOVEMBER 02, 2018 MR
More judgments on Section 234B
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026