SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, AJMER, AJMER
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided that deductions under Section 80-IA should be allowed while computing book profit under Section 115JB, as Section 115JB(5) allows for the application of other provisions of the Act unless specifically barred. It also noted that the assessee did not have an SEZ unit, distinguishing it from a prior case.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) heard multiple cross-appeals filed by the revenue and the assessee, Shree Cement Ltd., concerning assessment years 2015-16 to 2018-19. The appeals challenged orders of the CIT(A) which arose from assessments made under Section 143(3) read with Sections 144C and 144B of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
The key issues involved the validity of assessment orders passed under Section 144B and the eligibility of deductions under Section 80-IA for computing book profits under Section 115JB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C,Section 144B,Section 80-IA,Section 115JB,Section 10AA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. D.P. Sandhu & Bros.140 citing273 ITR 1 · 2005 · SC
- Best Trading and Agencies Limited v. DCIT45 citing428 ITR 52 · 2020 · HC · Read judgment
- ITO v. Frigsales (India) Ltd.38 citing4 SOT 376 · 2005 · ITAT
- 148 STC 225 (SC) (II) Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. v. CIT25 citing7 SCC 592 · 2006
- Neha Home Builders (P,) Ltd. v. DCIT22 citing195 TTJ 506 · 2018 · ITAT
- CIT v. D.P. Sandu Bros.18 citing142 Taxmann 713 · 2005 · SC
- (I) Mrf Ltd. v. Asstt. CST18 citing1 SCC 625 · 2005 · SC
- Chheda Electricals and Electronics (P) Ltd. v. DCIT7 citing195 ITD 354 · 2022 · ITAT
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM ITA Nos. 489 to 492/JP/2023 These are eight cross appeals filed by the revenue and assessee which are directed against the respective orders of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi- 44 [hereinafter referred to as (ld. CIT(A)] dated 08.06.2023 & 09.06.2023 for the Assessment Years 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19. These orders of the ld. CIT(A) are in turn arise out of an order passed by ACIT, NFAC, Delhi passed u/s 143 (3) r.w.s 144C(3) r.w.s 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [ here in after referred to act “Act”] on 10.06.2021, 16.05.2021, 12.08.2021 & 01.12.2021. 2. At the instant of both the parties these appeals were heard together and are disposed off with common order. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee and revenue in these bunch of appeals are as under:-
ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16
That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) was not justified and erred in not considering the assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C as invalid
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026