THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT CHANDRIKA SHARMA

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR ITA No.200/2008 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE,

2 ITA FILED U/S.260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 12-10-2007 PASSED IN ITA NO. 86/BNG/2006, FOR THE BLOCK PERIOD 1/4/1996 TO 09/5/2002, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT BANGALORE IN ITA NO. 86/BNG/2006, DATED 12-10-2007 CONFIRM THE ORDERS OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(2), BANGALORE. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, SREEDHAR RAO J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T Sri.U.S.Yogeshkumar accepts notice for respondent. The substantial questions of law at paragraph 4 and 5 in the appeal memo are taken up for consideration. This Court in ITA No.196/2008 disposed off on 6-7-2010 has answered the second question of law against the revenue. It is submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT V/S SURESH GUPTA reported in 297 ITR 322 held that the revenue is entitled to

3 levy surcharge under Section 113 of the Act and such levy has been upheld. Since the second question of law is answered against the revenue, the first question of law is not necessary to be answered. In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE mpk/-*