GURU KRISHNANAND CHARITABLE,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 CBE, COIMBATORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The CIT(A) partially allowed the appeal regarding the transfer of funds and unexplained investment, but upheld the addition for unexplained cash credits. The assessee then appealed to the Tribunal. The Tribunal noted that the AO passed an ex-parte order without a proper opportunity for the assessee to be heard and therefore set aside the order.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Guru Krishnanand Charitable Trust, did not file an income tax return for AY 2011-12. Following a search and inquiries, the Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for unexplained cash credits, transfer of funds from trust to personal accounts, and unexplained investment, assessing the total income at Rs. 1,28,48,725. The assessee appealed to the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte assessment order passed by the AO was valid without providing adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee, and if the additions made were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144,Section 147,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 271F,Section 13(1)(c)(ii),Section 13(3)(cc),Section 11,Section 12A,Section 132
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI
PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)
These appeals by the assessee are arising out of the separate orders of even date 20.12.2023 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chennai -20 for assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-2014. The assessments were framed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1, Coimbatore
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026