Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2014
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE N. KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE B. MANOHAR
REVIEW PETITION No.195 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NO.55/1, SHILPASHREE, VIDYARANYA COMPLEX, VISHWESWARANAGAR, MYSORE. . 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE –II, NO.55/1, SHILPASHREE, VIDYARANYA COMPLEX, VISHWESWARANAGAR, MYSORE.
….PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MRS. M. SHANTHI KAMATH, W/O. VIVEKANAND KAMATH, COLLEGE ROAD, MERCARA. … RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER
2 DATED 09.10.2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.382/2007, ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, N. KUMAR, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This Review Petition is preferred challenging the order passed by this Court dismissing the appeal –ITA No.382/2007 on 09.10.2012 holding that the net tax effect is less than Rs.10.00 lakhs in terms of Instruction No.3/2011 and reserving liberty to the Revenue to revive the appeal in the event of the Revenue succeeds in the Supreme Court.
This Review Petition is filed contending that neither the circular nor the judgment of this court passed in I.T.A. No.3191/2005 disposed of on 02.11.2011 (CIT Vs. RANKA & RANKA), is applicable to the facts of this case, as the tax effect in this case is recurring in nature. We do not see any substance in the said petition. Therefore, we do not see any justification to review the order. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed.
3 Petitioner’s counsel is permitted to carry-out necessary corrections to remove the office objections.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE KGR*