ACIT CIRCLE 2(1), GWALIOR vs. M/S SSS INVESTMENT P LTD, AGRA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's adjournment request and dismissed the appeal. This was because no additions were made based on the seized material, and the assessment was considered unabated at the time of the search.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order concerning assessment year 2008-09. The assessment proceedings were initiated under Section 153A following a search conducted on the assessee. The Revenue sought an adjournment to obtain a status report.
What were the issues?
Whether additions can be made in unabated assessment proceedings under Section 153A without relying on seized material. Whether an adjournment should be granted to the Revenue for obtaining a status report.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.2,379 citing454 ITR 212 · 2023 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, AGRA
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
ORDER
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2008-09 arises against Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), [in short, the “CIT(A)”] Gwalior’s order dated 16.11.2016, in case No. 396/IT/2011-12/Gwl, involving proceedings under Section 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’].
Coming to the Revenue’s instant appeal, we note at the outset that the learned departmental authorities had conducted the search in question in assessee’s case on 11.03.2010 leading to initiation of Section 153A proceedings culminating in the Assessing Officer’s assessment framed on 11.11.2011 making the additions in question. There could be hardly any dispute that we are dealing with an “unabated” assessment as on the date of search wherein any additions has to be made in the assessee’s hands based on the specific seized material only as per PCIT Vs. Abhisar Builwell P. Ltd. (2023) 454 ITR 212 (SC).
Learned CIT-DR at this stage seeks to postpone the hearing in the instant Revenue’s appeal on the ground that the necessary status report is yet to come from the field authorities.
We are of the considered view that given facts that there is no addition made on the basis of the seized material, we reject the Revenue’s instant adjournment as well as the main appeal in very terms.
This Revenue’s appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 12.02.2025
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026