SUDHANSHU MITTAL,DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 888/DEL/2015Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 December 2020AY 2009-102 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in view of the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2009-10. Subsequently, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as they opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Respondent: Shri. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 22.12.2020Pronounced: 22.12.2020

ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP : This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2009-10 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), New Delhi dated 10.11.2014.

2.

The assessee, vide its letter dated 16.12.2020, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the 2 ITA-888/Del/2015 assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →