ISHAN GARG,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 39(4), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 7110/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 December 2020AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's submission regarding the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee availed the benefit under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and received Form No. 3. Consequently, the assessee requested the withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “SMC-1” : DELHI

Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI

Hearing: 23.12.2020Pronounced: 23.12.2020

For Assessee : Shri Vinod Kumar Garg, CA For Revenue : Mr. Sri Prakash Dubey, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 23.12.2020 Date of Pronouncement : 23.12.2020 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.

This appeal has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-13, New Delhi, Dated 19.07.2019, for the A.Y. 2015-2016.

2.

We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties through video conferencing and perused the material on record.

2 ITA.No.7110/Del./2019 Shri Ishan Garg, New Delhi. 3. Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that assessee has availed the benefit under VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 and Form No.3 have been issued in favour of the assessee. Therefore, appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

In view of the above, appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, appeal of Assessee dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open Court.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →