RAJEEV GOEL HUF,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 49(5), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5511/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 December 2020AY 2014-153 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that the assessee can seek reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

What were the facts?

The assessee opted to settle tax arrears for AY 2014-15 under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, and filed the necessary declaration. The appeal was before the ITAT.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the impact of the assessee's decision to settle under the Vivad se Vishwas Act on the pending appeal before the ITAT.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 4

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI

For Appellant: Ms. Khushboo Arora, CA
Hearing: 23.12.2020Pronounced: 23.12.2020

ORDER PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the assessee against order dated 25.07.2017 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, New Delhi {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year 2014-15.

2.0 The Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) submits that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. It has been stated that the necessary

Sh. Rajeev Goel, (HUF) vs. ITO declaration in accordance with Section 4 of The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 has been filed by the assessee.

3.0 Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to the records and treated as dismissed.

4.0 However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The respondent (i.e., the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.

5.0 In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to the records and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 23 December, 2020.

More judgments on Section 4

All 1,145 judgments and leading authorities on Section 4 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →