RAJDEEP,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 37(4), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal extended the existing stays for a period of 180 days or until the disposal of the appeals, whichever is earlier. The Tribunal found no reason to ask for further deposits from the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed stay applications seeking extension of existing stays for multiple assessment years. The assessee had already deposited approximately 20% of the outstanding demand after excluding issues decided in their favour.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether to extend the stay on demand for the assessee pending disposal of appeals, considering the amounts already deposited and the reasons for delay in appeal disposal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI
Heard together (5 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
4.0 In the final result, all the Stay Applications stand allowed. Order pronounced on 24/12/2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
