IKR LOAN TRUST,MUMBAI vs. ITO 19(3)(2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3622/MUM/2014Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 February 2017AY 2010-1119 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal decided that the findings in the lead case would apply mutatis mutandis to all the current appeals. Additional grounds raised by the assessees, except for one specific case, were not pressed and were dismissed.

What were the facts?

Multiple appeals were filed by various loan trusts and the Income Tax Officer concerning different assessment years. The core issue revolved around grounds of appeal identical to those in a lead case involving Indian Corporate Loan Securitization Trust.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the applicability of the decision in a lead case to numerous similar appeals. Another issue involved the admission and consideration of additional grounds of appeal by both the assessee and the revenue.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10(23DA)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, F Bench, Mumbai

Before: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sandeep Gosain

For Appellant: Shri S.E. Dastur &, Shri Madhur Agarwal
For Respondent: Smt. S. Pandya
Hearing: 15.12.2016Pronounced: 22.02.2017

18 ITA 5513&5758/Mum/2014 & others IRE Loan Trust Apex Court in the case of National Thermal Power Corporation (supra) we admit for consideration the additional grounds raised by Revenue in those appeals in which it has been raised and the additional ground No. 5 raised by KES Loan Trust in its appeal in for A.Y. 2008-09. 6.1 We have heard the learned senior counsel for the assessee and the learned CIT-DR, who after due examination and verification, have agreed that since all the grounds of appeal raised in these appeals by both the assessee and Revenue are similar/identical to the grounds raised in the lead matter; i.e. the cross appeals in the case of Indian Corporate Loan Securitization Trust – 2008 Series -14 in ITA Nos. 3986 & 4343/Mum/ 2013, for A.Y. 2009-10, which is part of IL&FS Trust Co. Ltd. group of cases, the findings rendered by this Tribunal on various issues therein should be applied uniformly to all the 248 appeals in these cases. In these factual and legal circumstances, not only the learned CIT(A)s in all these cases, but also the learned counsel’s for both parties are agreed that the issues involved in these appeals across assessment years are similar and have been duly considered in the group cases of the IL&FS Trust Co. Ltd., of which group the lead matter is Indian Corporate Loan Securitization Trust – 2008, Series 14 in ITA Nos. 3986 & 4343/Mum/ 2013 for A.Y. 2009-10. Having decided grounds I, II, III and IV of the assessee’s appeal in the case of Indian Corporate Loan Securitisation Trust 2008 Series-14 in ITA No. 3986/Mum/2013 vide order dated 17.02.2017 in favour of the assessee Trust, the factual differences pointed out would have no bearing on the issues raised in appeals. Following the decision of this Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Indian Corporate Loan Securitization Trust – 2008, Series 14 in ITA Nos. 3986 & 4343/Mum/2013 dated 17.02.2017 (a copy of which will form part of this order), we hold and direct that the decision/findings rendered therein on various issues will accordingly apply mutatis mutandis to all these appeals for the assessment years concerned. The AO is accordingly directed.

More judgments on Section 10(23DA)

All 54 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10(23DA) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →