DCIT LTU, MUMBAI vs. THE TATA FINANCE LTD, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments under Section 147 was bad in law. This was because the Assessing Officer had already examined the relevant facts and materials during the original assessment proceedings under Section 143(3), and there was no fresh tangible material to justify reopening.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the ITAT's decision to quash reassessments made under Section 147 for AY 2003-04 and 2005-06. The Assessing Officer had reopened assessments to disallow losses on lease rentals and depreciation, and software expenditure, among other issues.
What were the issues?
Whether reopening of assessment under Section 147 is valid when the Assessing Officer has already examined the same issues during the original assessment under Section 143(3) without any fresh material.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(23)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.1,673 citing320 ITR 561 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. R.B. Wadkar695 citing268 ITR 332 · 2004 · HC
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.439 citing256 ITR 1 · 2002 · HC
- CIT v. Usha International Ltd.231 citing348 ITR 485 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- Asian Paints Ltd. v. DCIT175 citing308 ITR 195 · 2009 · HC
- Idea Cellular Ltd. v. Dy. CIT107 citing301 ITR 407 · 2008 · HC
- NYK Lime (India) Ltd. v. DCIT (No.2)71 citing346 ITR 361 · 2012 · HC
- Sound Casting (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT51 citing250 CTR 119 · 2012 · HC
- Siemens Information System Ltd. v. ACIT & Others49 citing295 ITR 333 · 2007 · HC
- CIT v. Foramer Finance41 citing251 ITR 416 · 2001 · HC
- Tao Publishing (P) Ltd. v. Dy.CIT41 citing370 ITR 135 · 2015 · HC
- GKN Sinter Metals Ltd. v. ACIT37 citing371 ITR 225 · 2015 · HC
- Cartini India Ltd. v. Addl. CIT & Anr.34 citing314 ITR 275 · 2009 · HC
- 340 ITR 299 (Bom.) (v) Desai Bros. Ltd. v. DCIT30 citing267 ITR 161 · 2004 · HC
- Rabo India Finance Ltd. v. DCIT30 citing346 ITR 528 · 2013 · HC
- Jal Hotels Co. Ltd. v. ADIT: 184 Taxman (Del)27 citing364 ITR 222 · 2014 · HC
- 251 ITR 416. 2. ICICI Bank Ltd. v. K.J. Rao24 citing268 ITR 203 · 2004 · HC
- Kimplas Trenton Fittings Ltd. v. ACIT21 citing340 ITR 299 · 2012 · HC
- Titanor Components Ltd. v. ACIT15 citing371 ITR 441 · 2011 · Read judgment
- Kelvinator of India Ltd. (320 ITR 561(SC), CIT v. ICICI Bank Ltd.14 citing349 ITR 482 · 2012 · HC
- Bhavesh Developers v. Assessing Officer6 citing188 Taxmann 123 · 2010 · HC
- 4 citing
- Crompton Greaves Ltd. v. ACIT (4 citing370 ITR 154 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “E ”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI C.N. PRASAD & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant 1. 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A), Mumbai. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. दवभागीय प्रदतदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, मुंबई / DR, ITAT, 5. Mumbai गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. 6. सत्यादपत प्रदत //True Copy//
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026