DCIT(TDS) CIR-58, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 934/KOL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 July 2017AY 2009-20102 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeal falls under CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, which directs withdrawal or non-pressing of appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 10 lakhs. The circular applies retrospectively to pending appeals.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2009-10. The appeal was listed for hearing, but the Revenue did not appear.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 21/2015.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

N/A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH: KOLKATA

Hearing: 23.05.2017Pronounced: 12.07.2017

ORDER

Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM

1.

This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-XX, Kolkata dated 18.02.2014 for AY 2009-10.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the revenue. At the outset, we find that the appeal of the revenue falls in the ken of the CBDT Circular no. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, wherein the CBDT has directed the department to withdraw/not press the appeal if the tax effect is less than Rs. 10 lacs before the ITAT. On perusal of the Circular No. 21 / 2015 dated 10.12.2015 and the materials available on record, we find that the revenue’s case does not fall under any of the exception clause as provided in the circular, as this is covered. We also find that the Circular makes it very clear that the revised monetary limits shall apply retrospectively to pending appeals also. We find that the Circular is binding on the tax authorities. This position has been confirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd reported in 267 ITR 272 (SC). Hence, we hold that the appeal of the revenue deserves to be dismissed in terms of low tax effect vide Circular No.21 / 2015 dated 10.12.2015. Accordingly, this being a low tax effect case, we dismiss this appeal of revenue in limine, as unadmitted, without going into the merits of the case. In case the revenue later finds that the tax effect is more than Rs. 10 lakhs then it is at liberty to move appropriate application to recall this order. With this Caveat, we are inclined to dismiss this appeal on the ground that it is below the tax effect of less than Rs.10 lakh.

3.

In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed.

Order is pronounced in the open court on 12.07.2017

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →