PUNEET YADU DALMIA.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-70(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3574/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 February 2021AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an order for assessment year 2015-16. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K.N. CHARY

For Respondent: Shri M. Barnwal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 17.02.2021Pronounced: 17.02.2021

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT

1.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax(A)-28, New Delhi dated 15.02.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2015-16.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide letter dated 1st February, 2021 2. has requested for withdrawal of the appeal and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under ITA 3574/D/2019 consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 17th February, 2021.

More judgments on Section 5(1)

All 1,811 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →