SH. GOPAL SINGH SUNDA,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 797/JPR/2023Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 May 2024AY 2018-1939 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the opening balance of loans claimed by the assessee remained unverified, unaccounted, and untaxed. The Tribunal also noted discrepancies in the assessee's working and the lack of identity and whereabouts of the parties involved in the transactions.

What were the facts?

During a search operation, a diary detailing cash loan transactions of the assessee was seized. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated certain loan advances and interest income as undisclosed income, disallowing the claim of an opening balance. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the AO's additions.

What were the issues?

Whether the opening balance of loans claimed by the assessee, derived from a seized diary, can be accepted as a source for subsequent transactions without proper verification. Whether the additions made on account of unexplained advances and alleged interest income are justified.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68,Section 132,Section 153C,Section 69C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR

Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM

For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar (CIT)
Hearing: 29/04/2024Pronounced: 30/05/2024

These seven appeals are filed by the assessee, which was arised out of the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Jaipur all dated 31.10.2023 [Here in after referred as “ld. CIT(A)” ] for the assessment years 2012-13 to 2018-19 respectively, which in turn arise from the orders dated 20.12.2019 passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153Cof the Income Tax Act [Here in after referred as “Act” ], by th

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →