ACIT,CIRCLE-3(1), NEW DELHI vs. APM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the tax effect in the departmental appeal was less than Rs. 50 lacs. As no exceptions were brought to notice, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 directs that departmental appeals shall not be filed if the tax effect does not exceed Rs. 50 lacs.
What were the issues?
Whether the departmental appeal is maintainable before the ITAT considering the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES ‘A’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Amit ShuklaDr. B. R. R. Kumar
Per Amit Shukla, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-I, New Delhi dated 09.08.2017.
According to Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, the CBDT in supersession of earlier instructions has directed that department’s appeals before ITAT shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs. 50 lacs. The tax will not include any interest thereon. It is further clarified that even if in the case of an assessee, disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal cannot be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit so specified.
2 APM Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. 3. Admittedly, in the departmental appeal, the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lacs, therefore, departmental appeal is not maintainable. The Ld. DR could not bring to our notice any exceptions mentioned in the said Circular.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 12/07/2021).
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026