VINEET BHARDWAJ,FARIDABAD vs. ITO WARD - 2(5), FARIDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue to the CIT(A) to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate their claim. The assessee is directed to appear without seeking adjournments.
What were the facts?
The assessee's return was selected for limited scrutiny regarding cash deposits. The AO made an addition of Rs. 17,69,420/- on account of long-term capital gains. The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(A), leading to an ex-parte order.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in passing an ex-parte order due to the assessee's non-appearance, and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “SMC-1” : DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
ORDER This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order dated 21.06.2019 of the Ld. CIT(A), Faridabad, relevant to the A.Y. 2016-2017.
Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, however, these all relate to the ex-parte order of the Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the additions made by the A.O.
2 ITA.No.6914/Del./2019 Sh Vineet Bhardwaj, Faridabad. 3. None appeared on behalf of the assessee, despite issue of notice. Therefore, this appeal is being decided on the basis of the material available on record and after hearing the Ld. D.R.
The facts, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and had filed his return of income on 03.08.2016 declaring total income of Rs.3,69,250/-. The case of the assessee was selected for limited scrutiny to verify the source of the cash deposited in the bank account. The A.O. completed the assessment under section 143(3) on 23.12.2018 determining the total income of assessee at Rs.21,38,670/- wherein he made addition of Rs.17,69,420/- on account of long term capital gains. Since the assessee did not appear before the Ld. CIT(A), the Ld. CIT(A) in the ex-parte order passed by him dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee.
Aggrieved with such Order of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
3 ITA.No.6914/Del./2019 Sh Vineet Bhardwaj, Faridabad.
I have heard the Ld. D.R. and perused the record. It is an admitted fact that A.O. completed the assessment under section 143(3) determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.21,38,670/- wherein he made addition of Rs.17,69,420/- on account of long term capital gains. I find since the assessee did not appear before the Ld. CIT(A) despite number of opportunities granted and the assessee was seeking adjournments from time to time and did not appear before him on the last occasion, the Ld. CIT(A) was constrained to pass the ex-parte order dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee for want of details. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, I deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate his claim and decide the issue as per fact and Law and pass a speaking order on merit. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the Ld. CIT(A) and substantiate his case without seeking any adjournment under any pretext, failing which, the Ld. CIT(A) is at liberty to pass appropriate orders
4 ITA.No.6914/Del./2019 Sh Vineet Bhardwaj, Faridabad. as per Law. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court at the time of hearing itself i.e., on 15.07.2021.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026