ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-26, NEW DELHI vs. INTEL INVOFIN INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 due to the low tax effect. The appeal was accordingly dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue preferred an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2009-10. The tax effect of the appeal was found to be less than Rs. 50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Maintainability of the appeal before the ITAT based on the tax effect threshold prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘C’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, & MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER,
This appeal by the Revenue is preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals] - XXVI, New Delhi dated 18.01.2018 pertaining to Assessment Year 2009-10.
A perusal of the grievance of the revenue shows that the tax effect would be less than Rs. 50 lakhs, therefore, this appeal is not maintainable as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019.
This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the revenue to approach the Tribunal as per the provisions of law, should it feel that the tax effect is more than Rs. 50 lakhs.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in is dismissed.
The order is pronounced in the open court on 09.09.2021 in the presence of ld. DR.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026