ITO, WARD-25(2), NEW DELHI vs. TEESTA URJA LTD, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CBDT circular enhanced the monetary limit for filing appeals to Rs. 50 lakhs and applies to pending appeals. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed as non-maintainable due to the tax effect being below the prescribed limit.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for assessment year 2014-15. The Revenue's representative brought to the Tribunal's attention a CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable before the Tribunal given the monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT for filing appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
N/A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI O.P. KANT
Date of hearing 23.11.2021 Date of pronouncement 23.11.2021 ORDER PER O.P. KANT, AM:
The present appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 21.08.2018 passed by Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-IX, New Delhi, for assessment year 2014-15. 2. At the outset, the learned Sr. DR brought to our attention that CBDT, vide Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08th August, 2019, has decided that the Revenue would not prefer any appeal before the Tribunal, if the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Therefore, he pleaded that the appeal of the Revenue be decided as per the Instruction of the CBDT.
We have heard learned Representatives of both the parties through Video Conferencing and perused the relevant material record. We find that the CBDT vide Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, has enhanced the monetary limit for filing of appeals by the Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal from Rs.20 lakhs to Rs.50 lakhs. The said circular also makes reference to the earlier Circular No. 3/2018, dated 11.7.2018 and, especially states that as a step towards further management of litigation, the Board has decided to enhance the monetary limit for filing of the appeals. This circular is not in supersession of the earlier circular but only amends the monetary limits as well as gives clarification with regard to paragraph 5 of the earlier circular. This, inter alia, means that all the other conditions mentioned in the earlier Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018 will apply mutatis mutandis including that, it will apply to all the pending appeals.
Further, CBDT vide Circular dated 20th August, 2019 (F. No. 279/19-93/2018-ITJ), has clarified that it will apply to all pending appeals. Thus, in view of the aforesaid circular, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as non-maintainable as the tax effect involved in the appeal is below Rs.50 lakhs. However, it is made clear that the Department is at liberty to file Miscellaneous Application for recalling of the order, if the tax effect is found to be more than the prescribed limit of Rs.50,00,000/- or any of the conditions etc., as available in the amendment carried out in para 10 of Circular No. 3/2018, dated 20.08.2018, is made out.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026