M. SQUARE ASSOCIATES,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 15(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the deduction under Section 35(1)(iii) is not allowable as the foundation was not approved. The matter was restored to the AO to verify eligibility for deduction under Section 80G.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 90,00,000/- under Section 35(1)(iii) for a donation to Research Foundation For Jainology. However, the foundation's approval under this section was rejected by the CBDT.
What were the issues?
Whether the donation to the Research Foundation For Jainology is eligible for deduction under Section 35(1)(iii) or Section 80G of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H”, BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM
आदेश / O R D E R PER R.C.SHARMA (A.M):
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)- 26, Mumbai dated 23/01/2014 for the A.Y.2009-10, wherein the assessee is aggrieved for denying deduction claim u/s.35(1)(iii) of the IT Act. As an alternate, it was prayed for deduction of donation so made u/s.80G of the IT act.
Rival contentions have been heard and record perused.
Facts in brief are that the assessee has claimed deduction in respect of payment of donation of Rs.90,00,000/- to Research Foundation For Jainology and claimed deduction @125% thereof u/s.35(1)(iii). However, the society ‘Research Foundation for Jainology’ was not approved for the M.Square Associates purpose of Section 35(1)(iii) for the relevant previous year i.e., F.Y.2008- 09 and the application for such approval by the society was rejected by CBDT on 28/05/2008. Accordingly, AO declined assessee’s claim of deduction u/s.35(1)(iii). By the impugned order, CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO.
It was submitted by learned AR that in terms of the decision of Chennai High Court dated 25/04/2011, CBDT is still in the process of passing orders regarding renewal of approval of the society and therefore, matter should be restored to AO. Learned AR has submitted alternatively that in case deduction u/s.35(1)(iii) is not allowed, the Society is also approved for deduction u/s.80G and accordingly, the A.O. should be directed to allow deduction u/s.80G. Learned AR has also filed a letter dated 03/09/2007 from Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai to the fact that the society ‘Research Foundation For Jainology’ is approved for deduction u/s.80G for the period 01/04/2007 to 31/03/2010.
We have considered rival contentions and do not find any merit for assessee’s claim of deduction u/s. 35(1)(iii) as the CBDT has already rejected the approval of Research Foundation on 28/05/2008. So far as assessee’s claim for deduction u/s.80G is concerned, we restore the matter back to the file of the AO to verify the factual position and find out if research foundation of Jainology is approved for deduction u/s.80G during the relevant period in which donation has been given and for deciding the issue afresh as per law. We direct accordingly.
More judgments on Section 35(1)(iii)
- Asha Didwania, Bhadrak vs The Income Tax Officer, Bhadrak Ward…ITA 292/CTK/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2025AY 2013-14
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Velayudame Ponnambalame Ramalingame…ITA 2515/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed23 May 2025AY 2018-19
- M/S. Baid Trade Fina Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), KolkataITA 2453/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed30 Apr 2025AY 2021-22
- D Thakkar Developers Private Limited, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 14(1)(2)…ITA 2975/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed20 Dec 2024AY 2014-15
- ITO (Exemptions) Rohtak, Rohtak vs Manohar Education Society, HaryanaITA 2672/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2024AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026