ANJU AGARWAL,KAMLA NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee advanced a sum to the Aartia, who then purchased and sold goods on the assessee's behalf. The assessee neither took delivery nor sold goods, and no consideration was exchanged with the Aartia. The net surplus of Rs. 3.81 Lacs was disclosed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in food-grain trading, was alleged to have obtained accommodation purchase entries from an Aartia for Rs. 53.43 Lacs. The Assessing Officer (AO) added this amount to the assessee's income. The CIT(A) confirmed the assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition made by the AO on account of alleged bogus purchase entries, confirmed by CIT(A), is sustainable when the transaction was handled by an Aartia.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, AGRA
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
(िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / (िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Anju Agarwal Income-tax Officer, बनाम/ D-26, Kamla Nagar Ward 2(1)(1), Agra. Vs. Agra (UP). �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AWTPA-4297-L (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (��थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Sh. K.K. Jain, Adv. – Ld. AR ��थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Sh. Shailender Shrivastava, - Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 21-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 23-04-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeals by assessee for Assessment Years (AY) 2017-18 and 2018-19 arise out of separate orders of first appellate authority. First, we take up appeal for AY 2017-18 which arises out of an order passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi [CIT(A)] on 30-09-2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 11-02-2022. The assessee is stated to be engaged in trading of food-grains. In the assessment order, Ld. AO alleged that the assessee obtained accommodation purchase entry from M/s Umesh Kumar Vivek Kumar (managed by Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta) for Rs.53.43 Lacs. The assessee did not carry out any other transaction with any other entity. The Ld. AO, after adjusting returned income of Rs.3.81 Lacs, added the differential of Rs.49.62 Lacs to the income of the assessee u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the assessment against which the assessee is in further appeal before us.
From the case records, it emerges that the assessee has carried on food-grain business through aartia M/s Umesh Kumar Vivek Kumar prop. Shri Vivek Kumar Gupta. For the said purpose, the assessee advanced certain sum to that entity and that entity, in turn, purchased the goods first and then sold the goods on behalf of the assessee. The assessee has neither taken the delivery of the goods nor sold the goods and all the transactions of sale and purchase has been done by that entity only. No purchase / sale consideration has been paid to / from the aartia. The assessee has only received net surplus of Rs.3.81 Lacs which has duly been disclosed in the return of income. On these facts, no allegation of bogus sale or purchase could be sustained against the assessee. Accordingly, by deleting the impugned addition, we allow the appeal on merits. Delving into other grounds has been rendered mere academic in nature. The appeal stand allowed.
Facts as well as issues in AY 2018-19 are quite identical. Accordingly, our adjudication as above shall mutatis mutandis apply to this appeal also.
Both the appeals stand allowed. Order pronounced u/r 34(4) of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026