SHRI MITHAILAL S. DALSINGAR SINGH,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-17(3), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2525/MUM/2013Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 April 2017AY 2006-076 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal is hearing cross-appeals concerning the applicability of Section 50C on the sale/transfer of capital assets and the Stamp Duty Valuation of a Power of Attorney. The specific grounds of appeal relate to whether Section 50C applies when the Agreement for Sale is not registered.

What were the facts?

The assessee and the Revenue filed cross-appeals against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2006-07. The appeals arose from an assessment order passed by the AO under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act.

What were the issues?

The key issues are the applicability of Section 50C to capital asset transfers where the sale agreement is unregistered, and the valuation of a Power of Attorney for stamp duty purposes.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 50C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI JOGINDER SINGH & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR

For Appellant: Shri Hari S. Raheja
For Respondent: Shri Suman Kumar, D.R

Heard together (2 matters)

I.T.A. No.2525/Mum/2013
I.T.A. No.3528/Mum/2013

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER RAMIT KOCHAR, Accountant Member These are cross appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (hereinafter called “the tribunal”). Since common issues are involved, these cross appeals are heard together and are disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. These appeals are directed against the appellate order dated 15th February, 2013 passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 29, Mumbai (hereinafter called “the CIT(A)”), for the assessment year 2006-07, the appellate proceedings before the learned CIT(A) arising from the assessment order dated 24th December, 2008 passed by learned Assessing Officer (hereinafter called “the AO”) u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act,1961 (hereinafter called “the Act”).

2.

The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in ITA No. 2525/Mum/2013 for assessment year 2006-07 in the memo of appeal filed with the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (hereinafter called “the tribunal”) read as under:-

“1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) erred in holding that provisions of section 50C are applicable on sale/transfer of capital assets being plot No. 749 and 750. The appellant submits that the provisions of section 50C are not applicable as the Agreement for Sale was not registered.

2.

On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) erred in accepting the Stamp Duty Valuation of Power of Attorney registered with the Sub-

More judgments on Section 50C

All 3,223 judgments and leading authorities on Section 50C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →