ACIT, CHENNAI vs. BUZZWORKS BUSINESS SERVICES PVT. LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a CBDT circular cannot overrule a High Court judgment. Therefore, the CIT(A) was correct in following the Madras High Court's judgment, which allowed the claim.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order regarding the disallowance of employees' contribution towards PF and ESI. The assessee had paid these contributions before the due date for filing the return of income.
What were the issues?
Whether a CBDT circular can override a High Court judgment regarding the allowability of employee contributions paid before the due date of filing the return of income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -1, Chennai, dated 21.11.2016 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13.
The only issue arises for consideration is disallowance of employees contribution towards PF and ESI.
We have heard the Ld. Departmental Representative and the Ld.counsel for the assessee. It is not in dispute that employees contribution to ESI and PF were paid before the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). The only contention of the Ld. D.R. before this Tribunal is that the CBDT issued circular on 17.12.2015 after the judgment of Madras High Court in CIT v. Industrial Security & Intelligence India Pvt. Ltd. in Tax Case (Appeal) Nos,585 and 586 of 2015 dated 24.07.2015. Therefore, the circular issued by the CBDT would prevail over the judgment of Madras High Court. We are unable to accept the contention of the Ld. D.R. The judgment of Madras High Court cannot be overruled by an executive order of the CBDT. This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the judgment of Madras High Court can be overruled only by the judgment of Apex Court and not by any of the executive authorities in the country. Therefore, unless and until the judgment of Madras High Court is overruled by Apex Court, the CBDT cannot issue any circular contradicting the judgment of Madras High Court. In other words, the judgment of Madras High Court would prevail over the circular issued by CBDT. Hence, the CIT(Appeals) has rightly followed the judgment of Madras High Court and allowed the claim of the assessee. Therefore, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 9th June, 2017 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 139(1)
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 485/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026