SHCIL SERVICES LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIR 4(2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1221/MUM/2011Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 May 2017AY 2007-083 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, following the Supreme Court's decision in CIT Vs. Kotak Securities Ltd, held that transaction charges paid to the Stock Exchange are for facilities provided and not for technical services. Therefore, no TDS was deductible under Section 194J, and the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was incorrect.

What were the facts?

The assessee paid transaction charges to the Bombay Stock Exchange. The Assessing Officer disallowed these charges under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS. The Tribunal had previously ruled against the assessee, but this was based on a High Court decision later reversed by the Supreme Court.

What were the issues?

Whether transaction charges paid to the Stock Exchange are subject to TDS under Section 194J, and consequently, whether disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) is justified.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 40(a)(ia),Section 194J

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI C.N. PRASAD & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR

Hearing: 8.3.2017Pronounced: 12.5.2017

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA NO.1796/MUM/2011
ITA NO.1221/MUM/2011

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

आदेश / O R D E R PER C.N.PRASAD (JM) This appeal is recalled for the purpose of disposing of the ground relating to disallowance of transaction charges paid to BSE u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act.

2 & CO No.1221/Mum/2011 (A.Y.2007-08) M/s SCHCIL Services Ltd.

2.

This Tribunal by order dated 28.8.2014 in ITA No.1796/Mum/2011 decided this issue against the Assessee by following the jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kotak Securities Ltd [340 ITR 333]. Subsequently, the Hon’ble Supreme Court reversed the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kotak Securities Ltd, wherein, it was held that the view taken by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court that the transaction charges paid to the Bombay Stock Exchange by its members are for technical services rendered is not an appropriate view. It was held that such charges are in the nature of payments made for facilities provided by the Stock Exchange and no TDS on such payments would therefore be deductible u/s 194J of the Act. In view of this decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the appeal of the Revenue was recalled by this Tribunal in MA No.106/Mum/2010 dated 31.2.2017 to dispose off the ground in consonance with the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kotak Services Ltd. Therefore, respectfully following the said decision, we decide this issue in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. Assessing Officer is directed to delete the disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) in respect of transaction charges paid by the Assessee to Stock Exchange.

3.

In the result, appeal of the Revenue on this ground is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on the 12th day of May 2017.

More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)

All 7,300 judgments and leading authorities on Section 40(a)(ia) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →