DEVANG C. GORADIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 20(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) has no power to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution and must pass an order on merits. The case was remitted back to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) for non-prosecution. The assessee contended that the CIT(A) erred by not deciding the appeal on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) can dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution instead of deciding it on merits.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF)659 citing240 Taxmann 133 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. S. Chenniappa Mudaliar40 citing74 ITR 41 · 1969 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “SMC”, MUMBAI
Before: Shri Shamim Yahya
O R D E R This appeal by the assessee is directed against order of learned CIT(A) dated 23.11.2016 and pertains to assessment year 2011-12.
At the outset, in this case, the assessee has raised the ground that the learned CIT(A) has erred in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution and not passing an order on merits of the case.
In this case it is noted that the learned CIT(A) has not passed an order on merits of the case but has dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. In this regard it is noted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. T.A.Luthara HUF 240 Taxman 133 has held that learned CIT(A) has no power to dismiss appeal for non-prosecution. It is incumbent upon him to pass an order on merits of the case. Similarly the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of CIT v. S.Chenniappa Mudaliar [(1969) 74 ITR 41 (SC)] has held that . Shri Devang C.Goradia the Appellate Tribunal cannot dismiss for default but has to give speaking order on merits.
Accordingly, in the background of the aforesaid precedents, the issue raised in this appeal are remitted to the file of learned CIT(A). The learned CIT(A) is directed to pass a speaking order on merits of the case after giving the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard.
In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026