PRANAV H VORA,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 25(3)(2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1064/MUM/2017Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 May 2017AY 2009-102 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) has no power to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution and must pass an order on merits. Therefore, the case was remitted back to the CIT(A).

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) for non-prosecution, without passing an order on merits. The assessee contended that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal on this ground.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) has the power to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution instead of deciding on merits.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “SMC”, MUMBAI

Before: Shri Shamim Yahya

For Appellant: Shri B.Satyanarayana Raju
For Respondent: Shri B.Satyanarayana Raju
Hearing: 16.05.2017Pronounced: 16.05.2017

O R D E R This appeal by the assessee is directed against order of learned CIT(A) dated 07.12.2016 and pertains to assessment year 2009-10.

2.

At the outset, in this case, the assessee has raised the ground that the learned CIT(A) has erred in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution and not passing an order on merits of the case.

3.

In this case it is noted that the learned CIT(A) has not passed an order on merits of the case but has dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. In this regard it is noted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. T.A.Luthara HUF 240 Taxman 133 has held that learned CIT(A) has no power to dismiss appeal for non-prosecution. It is incumbent upon him to pass an order on merits of the case. Similarly the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of CIT v. S.Chenniappa Mudaliar [(1969) 74 ITR 41 (SC)] has held that . Shri Pranav H.Vora the Appellate Tribunal cannot dismiss for default but has to give speaking order on merits.

4.

Accordingly, in the background of the aforesaid precedents, the issue raised in this appeal are remitted to the file of learned CIT(A). The learned CIT(A) is directed to pass a speaking order on merits of the case after giving the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard.

5.

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →