M/S. BEST DWELLERS (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2402/DEL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 July 2016AY 2005-065 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that since the assessment for the year stood completed before the search and no incriminating material was found to justify the disallowance under section 40A(3), the addition could not be sustained. The disallowance was deleted on this legal ground.

What were the facts?

A search and seizure operation was conducted on the assessee, and a notice under section 153A was issued. During the assessment, the AO disallowed a sum under section 40A(3) for cash payments made for land purchase. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition.

What were the issues?

Whether a disallowance under section 40A(3) can be made in a search assessment under section 153A when the assessment for the year was already completed and no incriminating material was found.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 40A(3),Section 153A,Section 132,Section 139(1),Section 143(1),Section 143(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : A : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL, AM & MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Shri Somil Agarwal, Shri Abhishek Anand, Avocates
For Respondent: Shri S.K. Jain, DR
Hearing: 27.07.2016Pronounced: 28.07.2016

ORDER PER R.S. SYAL, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee arises out of the order passed by the CIT(A) on 24.12.2013 in relation to the assessment year 2005-06.

2.

The only issue raised in this appeal is against the confirmation of disallowance of a sum of Rs.14,96,000/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act on the ground that the AO did not have any jurisdiction to pass the assessment order u/s 153A.

3.

Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in purchase and sale, exchange, lease, etc. of immovable property and moveable property. A search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was carried out on 21.1.2011 in DS Group of cases. In response to notice u/s 153A issued on 9.1.2012, the assessee filed a return of income declaring a loss of Rs.13,076/-. The AO noticed during the course of assessment proceedings that the assessee made cash payments amounting to Rs.74,80,000/- for purchase of land. He invoked the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act and made disallowance for a sum of Rs.14,96,000/-. The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition on merits.

4.

At the very outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee contended that the disallowance u/s 40A(3) is not based on any incriminating material found during the course of search. It was submitted that such a disallowance is unwarranted because the assessment for the instant year already stood completed on the date of search. In support of this proposition, he relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2016) 380 ITR 573 (Del). In the opposition, the ld. DR relied on the impugned order.

5.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Kabul Chawla (supra) has held that no addition can be made to the income already assessed if no incriminating material is found during the search.

The assessee in the instant case filed original return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act on 27.10.2005. A copy of the return physically received by the Department on 27.10.2005, is placed on record. The ld. AR contended that no notice u/s 143(2) was issued by the AO for the instant year. This contention remained uncontroverted on behalf of the Revenue. This shows that the assessee filed its return u/s 139(1) of the Act which was duly processed u/s 143(1) of the Act, thereby assigning finality to the assessment, because no notice u/s 143(2) was issued for completing assessment u/s 143(3). It indicates that the assessment for the instant year stood completed on the date of search. Going by the verdict given by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Kabul Chawla (supra) that no addition can be made otherwise than those based on incriminating material found during the course of search in the case of completed assessments on the date of initiation of search, we find that the instant disallowance u/s 40A(3), which is not based on any incriminating material found during the course of search, cannot be sustained. We, therefore, order for the deletion of the addition on this legal ground.

6.

In view of the above decision on the preliminary legal issue, there is no need to take up the disallowance u/s 40A(3) on merits.

7.

In the result, the appeal is allowed in above terms.

The order pronounced in the open court on 28.07.2016.

More judgments on Section 40A(3)

All 3,278 judgments and leading authorities on Section 40A(3) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →