Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Before: SHRI H.S. SIDHU
Date of Hearing : 22-08-2016 Date of Order : 02-09-2016
O R D E R PER H.S. SIDHU, JM This appeal by the Department is directed against the Order dated 07.9.2015 of Ld. CIT(A)-3, New Delhi pertaining to assessment year 2011-12 on the following grounds:-
1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, ld. CIT(A) erred in treating the interest earned by the assessee by parking the share application money in bank account as capital receipts instead of income from other sources.
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in relying upon the Hon’ble
Delhi high Court judgment in the case of M/s Indian Oil Panipat Consortium Ltd. (2009) 315 ITR 255 and also upon the Hon’ble Supreme Court decision in the case of M/s Bokaro Steel Limited (1999) 236 ITR 315 without appreciating the ratio of Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment in the case of M/s Tuticorin Alkalies Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited 227 ITR 172 3. The appellant craves to add, alter, amend, modify, add or forego any ground of appeal at any time before or during the hearing of the appeal.”
2. From the above, I find that the tax effect in the Revenue’s Appeal is less than Rs.10,00,000/-, therefore, the Department’s Appeal is not maintainable, in view of the Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 issued vide F.No. 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt.) by the CBDT. For the sake of convenience, the relevant para nos. 3 & 10 of the aforesaid CBDT’s Circular are reproduced as under:- “3. Henceforth, appeals/ SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:
Monetary Limit S No Appeals in Income-tax matters (in Rs) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case.
This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/ Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/ not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.”
It is not in dispute that the Board’s instruction or directions issued to the income-tax authorities are binding on those authorities, therefore, the Department should have withdrawn/ not pressed the present Appeal, in view of the aforesaid instructions since the tax effect in the instant Appeal is less than the amount of Rs. 10 lacs, prescribed in the above said CBDT’s Instructions.
Keeping in view the CBDT Instruction No. 21/2015 dated 10th 4. December, 2015, I am of the view that the Revenue should have withdrawn/ not pressed the instant appeal before the Tribunal. I am also of the view that the said Instructions are applicable for the pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in Tribunal. Accordingly, the Revenue’s Appeal is dismissed. 5. In the result, Appeal filed by the Revenue Stands dismissed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 02/09/2016.