Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCH-B, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 266/JP/2021
PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM.
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 16.03.2020 passed by the ld. PCIT, Ajmer under section 263 of the I.T. Act, 1961. However, while going through the case file, it was pointed out by the ld. D/R that the present appeal is not maintainable on the ground that the order giving effect of the impugned order passed under section 263 has already been passed by the AO while passing the assessment order under section 143(3) read with section 263 read with section 144B of the IT Act on 19.09.2021 and the assessee has already preferred appeal against the said order of assessment which is still pending before the ld. CIT (A).
The grounds of appeal taken before us challenging the order passed under section 263 are as under :-
1. The ld. AO has erred in facts and law on making addition on account of disallowance of written off of advances to the tune of Rs. 13,55,74,000/-.
2. The ld. AO has erred in facts and law on making addition on account of disallowance of various expenditure to the tune of Rs. 2,43,98,674/-.
The ld. AO has erred in facts and law on making addition on account of sale/disposition of fixed assets to the tune of Rs. 64,72,780/-.
4. Consequential levy of interest u/s 234B is bad in law.
Consequential initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)© of Income Tax Act, 1961 is bad in law.
The appellant craves to add/alter grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing.
3. After going through the grounds of appeal filed by the assessee, we noticed that though the assessee has challenged the impugned order under section 263 passed by the ld. PCIT, but the grounds raised by the assessee has challenged the order of the AO in making additions/disallowances under the different provisions of the IT Act which in our view is not maintainable. Since the assessee has not raised any ground qua challenging the order passed under section 263, rather on the contrary the assessee has challenged the order of assessment, which is not subject matter of appeal before us, as the separate appeal has already been filed by the assessee which is pending before ld. CIT (A) wherein the order of assessment passed by the AO has already been challenged by the assessee. Therefore, there is no cause of action for the assessee to maintain the present appeal. Thus the present appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed on this ground alone.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 28/07/22.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼lanhi xkslkbZ½ ¼ MkW- ehBk yky ehuk ½ (Dr. Mitha Lal Meena) (Sandeep Gosain) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 28/07/2022. das/ आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Ajmer. 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent-The PCIT, Ajmer. 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 4. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT(A) 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File {ITA No. 266/JP/2021} vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत