LAL SINGH,KARNAL vs. ITO, KARNAL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4475/DEL/2012Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 October 2016AY 2009-103 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal inferred that the assessee was not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Following established precedents, the appeal was treated as un-admitted and dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2009-10. Despite receiving advance notice, the assessee neither appeared nor sought an adjournment.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the non-prosecution of the appeal by the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

N/A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R. S. SYAL & SMT SUCHITRA KAMBLE

Hearing: 10.10.2016Pronounced: 10.10.2016

ORDER PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM

This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order dated 20.05.2012 passed by CIT(A) Karnal for Assessment Year 2009-10. Despite sending notice of hearing sufficiently in advance, neither assessee attended nor any application for adjournment has been received. It is thus inferred that the assessee is not interested to prosecute this appeal.

2.

Having regard to Rule 19(2) of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd. [38 ITD 320 (Delhi)] and Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court’s decision in case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar Vs. CWT [223 ITR 480 (MP)], this appeal is treated as un-admitted and dismissed.

3.

In result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed for non prosecution.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →