JASMINA TRUST,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the amendment to Section 10(34) is applicable from AY 2017-18, Section 115BBDA, which provides for special tax rates on dividend income, is applicable only to Individuals, HUFs, and Firms, not Trusts. Therefore, the dividend income remains exempt for the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Trust, declared Nil income. The AO made additions of Rs. 25,51,286/- on account of dividend income and disallowed expenditures. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance of expenditure but upheld the addition of dividend income, allowing a basic exemption and taxing the rest under Section 115BBDA.
What were the issues?
Whether dividend income received by a Trust is taxable when Section 115BBDA, which removes exemption for dividend income exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs, specifically applies only to Individuals, HUFs, and Firms.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(34),Section 115BBDA,Section 57(1),Section 143(3),Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM: This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (‘the CIT(A)’ in short) dated 30.01.2025 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, in short) in Appeal No. CIT(A), Delhi-17/10854/2019-20 against the assessment order dated 30.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act for Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is a Trust having registration u/s 12A of the Act and filed its return of income declaring total income at Nil. The case of the assessee trust was selected for scrutiny wherein the AO has made the additions Jasmina Trust vs. DCIT of Rs. 25,51,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(34)
- Unnathan Shekhar, Mumbai vs ACIT Circle 15(1)(2), MumbaiITA 7930/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Tata Consumer Products Limited, Kolkata vs A.C.I.T., Circle - 4(1), KolkataITA 1604/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Ramkrishna Bajaj Charitable Trust, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle…ITA 66/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- M/S. Jsw Infrastructure Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6051/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Teck Consultancy and Services Private… vs ACIT, Central Circle 8(2), MumbaiITA 2166/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026