SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

ITA 98/JAB/2025Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 June 2025AY 2019-20Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the severe disruption to the society's functioning due to embezzlement and the appointment of an administrator. It restored the matters to the AO for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for the administrator to ensure due compliance.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to file returns and respond to notices from the AO, leading to best judgment assessments and penalties. The assessee claimed non-compliance was due to embezzlement of funds, arrest of staff, and appointment of an administrator.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee's non-compliance and failure to respond to notices were sufficiently explained by the embezzlement and administrative changes, and if the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144,Section 270A,Section 271AAC(1),Section 69A,Section 56,Section 115BBE

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR

Before: SH. KUL BHARAT & SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY

For Respondent: DR & Sh. Shrawan Kumar
Hearing: 22.05.2025Pronounced: 30.06.2025

PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.

These four appeals have been filed against the various orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC dismissing its appeals against orders passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 and orders passed dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee against penalties levied under section 270A of the Income Tax Act and 271AAC(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2019-20. As the issues involved in all these cases is similar and they are inter-related as they were all he

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →