MAHARASHTRA AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-3(2)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 521/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 March 2024AY 2088-09Bench: SHRI KULDIP SINGH (Judicial Member), MS. PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)44 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the AO's order giving effect to the ITAT's order was passed beyond the prescribed time limit under Section 153(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, the AO's order was considered void ab initio and bad in law.

What were the facts?

The assessee and the revenue filed cross-appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) concerning various assessment years. A key issue was the delay by the Assessing Officer (AO) in passing an order giving effect to a previous ITAT order.

What were the issues?

Whether the order passed by the Assessing Officer giving effect to the ITAT's order was barred by limitation. Whether the delay in passing such an order renders it void.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 153(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(12)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & MS. PADMAVATHY S

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh Mehta, A.R
For Respondent: Smt Sanyogita Nagpal, D.R

Per Bench:

Af

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 153(5)

All 52 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153(5) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →