EVERSMILE PROPERTIES P LIMITED,THANE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 10(1)(2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2501/MUM/2023Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 March 2024AY 2017-18Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal restored both appeals back to the file of the First Appellate Authority. The CIT(A) is directed to decide the issues on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeals were dismissed ex-parte by the NFAC without deciding on merits. The NFAC noted that the assessee failed to file submissions despite opportunities given.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without deciding on merits. The need to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC‘

For Respondent: Shri R.R.Makwana
Hearing: 18/03/2024Pronounced: 18/03/2024

आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH: The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against order dated 23/12/2022 for the A.Y.2017-18 and 2009-10 passed by NFAC, Delhi.

2.

Assessee is mainly aggrieved by exparte order passed by the ld. CIT(A) dismissing the appeal in limine and without deciding the issue on merits.

3.

From the perusal of the impugned order it is seen that assessee’s case was posted for hearing and notices were sent through ITBA portal from NFAC. In the impugned order ld. CIT (A) has incorporated the grounds as well as the statement of facts. However, he noted that assessee was granted opportunity to file submissions and documents vide notice dated 22/01/2021 and 30/11/2022. Since, no submissions have been filed and therefore, appeal of the assessee has been dismissed on the ground that assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Since, appeal has been dismissed exparte by the ld. CIT (A) without deciding on merits, therefore, in the interest of justice, both the appeals are restored back to the file of the First Appellate Authority to decide the issue on merits after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee and the assessee is also directed to update the correct e-mail ID and participate in the proceedings to substantiate its case. Accordingly, both the appeals are restored back to the file of the ld. CIT (A).

4.

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 18th March, 2024.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →