THE WEST BENGAL STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-56, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following a co-ordinate bench's decision in the assessee's own case, held that these payments to casual staff during festivals were in the nature of ex-gratia/bonus and were authorized by the Board of Directors. The Tribunal found that the disallowance was unjustified.
What were the facts?
The assessee bank claimed expenses for 'Bakshis' and 'Tips & Bakshis' as allowable business expenses. The Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) disallowed these expenses, stating a lack of commercial expediency and unsatisfactory explanation.
What were the issues?
Whether payments made as 'Tips & Bakshis' to casual staff during festivals constitute allowable business expenses under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : KOLKATA
Before: Hon’ble Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, AM & Hon’ble Shri A.T. Varkey, JM ]
ORDER Per J.Sudhakar Reddy, AM
This appeal by the Assessee arises out of the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Kolkata [ in short the ld CITA] dated 10.12.2015 against the order passed by the DCIT, Circle-56, Kolkata [ in short the ld AO] under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) dated 14.03.2013 for the Assessment Year 2010-11 on the following grounds :
1. That on the facts of the case, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 12, Kolkata, was wrong by not considering the fact of the case and by confirming the addition made by the Ld. Assessing Officer under the head “Bakshis” of Rs. 3,76,166/- and “Tips & Bakshis” of Rs. 66,400/- which are allowable expenses under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
West Bengal State Co-operative Bank Ltd. A.Yr.2010-11 2. That on the facts of the case, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 12, Kolkata was wrong by not considering the fact of the case and explanation given by the appellant that the expenses were in the nature of salary/wages paid as bonus during Eid/Durga Puja festival to casual staffs like peon, lift man, security staff etc. employed by the appellant through another service provider which is also being a co-operative society and such expenditures are very much incidental to and for the purpose of carrying on day to day business and allowable u/s 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
That your petitioner reserves the right to prefer further ground(s) and/or delete/modify ground(s)/arguments, submit documents before the final disposal of this appeal.
After hearing the rival contentions, we find that this issue covered by the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the assessee’s own case in dated 30.11.2013 wherein it was held as under:
“6. Ground no 2 and 3 is against the disallowance of expenditure of an amount paid as Tips & Baksis by the bank to casual workers on festive occasion. The assessee submits that these payments were made to casual workers like water boys, canteen boys, security staffs etc. during annual festivals like Durga Puja and Eid. It was submitted that the payment is in the nature of ex- gratia/bonus. The break-up of these payments, as made by different branches of the bank was given. These payments were authorised by appropriate resolutions of the Board of Director of the bank. The Assessing officer as well as the Ld. CIT (A) did not allow this expenditure on the ground that there was no commercial expediency behind incurring this expenditure and that the explanation is not satisfactory. The ld. Counsel for the assessee the disallowance is bad in law the assessee has produced sufficient evidence in the form of vouchers and receipts in evidence of any payment of Tips & Baksis. Payments were made by the Head Office, Regional Offices as well as 44 branches situated in different parts of West Bengal. Such payments are made after due authorization from the management. The revenue authorities were wrong in coming to a conclusion that there is no commercial expediency in making these payments. The disallowance arbitrarily unjustified. Hence we allow this ground of the assessee”.
West Bengal State Co-operative Bank Ltd. A.Yr.2010-11 Respectfully following the same, we allow both the grounds filed by the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the Court on 05.01.2018
More judgments on Section 37
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company…ITA 933/AHD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company…ITA 932/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company…ITA 931/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company… vs The ACIT, Circle-2(1)(1), VadodaraITA 768/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026