AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY,USA vs. DCIT(INTERNATIONAL TAX), CIRCLE 1(1)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the subscription fees received for access to databases and journals do not constitute royalty income. It followed its own previous decisions for earlier assessment years where similar issues were decided in favor of the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee, American Chemical Society, received subscription fees from Indian customers for access to online chemistry databases and journals. The Assessing Officer treated these receipts as royalty income taxable in India.
What were the issues?
Whether subscription fees for access to online databases and journals are taxable as royalty income in India under the Income Tax Act and the India-US DTAA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 9(1)(vi),Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 234A,Section 234B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- American Chemical Society v. DCIT10 citing106 Taxmann.com 253 · 2019 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH& MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL,
Per Amarjit Singh (AM): This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the ld. DCIT(IT) Circle 1(1)(1), Mumbai, dated 30.10.2023 for A.Y. 2021-22 in pursuance of directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel under section 144(C(5) of the Act issued on 21/09/2023. The assessee has raised the following grounds before us: “Appeal under section 253(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), against the order dated 30 October 2023
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vi)
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Slack Technologies Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 979/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Slack Technologies Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4310/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Atos Information Technology (Singapore) Pte… vs DCIT, (Internation Taxation) Circle…ITA 6745/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs Times Content Limited( Now Known As Times…ITA 5333/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026