ASST CIT 8(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. SEA LINKERS P.LTD, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Departmental Representative submitted that the tax effect involved in the appeal was less than Rs. 10.00 lacs. Following CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable due to the low tax effect.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The appeal pertained to the assessment year 2010-11. The Assessing Officer had passed an order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the revenue is maintainable before the Tribunal given the tax effect below the revised monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘L’ BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAJENDRA, AM & SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM
आदेश / O R D E R
PER RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The captioned appeal filed by the revenue pertaining to assessment year 2010-11 is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-14, Mumbai, dated 28.02.2017, which in itself arises from the P a g e | ACIT Vs. M/s. Sea Linkers Pvt. Ltd. order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’), dated 11.03.2016.
At the very outset of the hearing of the appeal it was submitted by the ld. Departmental Representative (for short D.R.) that tax effect involved in this appeal is less than Rs.10.00 lacs. The CBDT vide its Circular No. 21.2015, dated 10.12.2015 has revised the monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before the Tribunal, retrospectively. Since the tax effect in dispute in the captioned appeal is stated to be below the monetary limit of Rs.10.00 lac specified in the CBDT Circular, dated 10.12.2015 (supra), the same is dismissed as not maintainable.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026