SRI. KRISHNA MOORARJI JARIWALA,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD. 24(2)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The corrigendum rectifies a mistake in the assessment year mentioned in the original order. The assessment year was incorrectly stated as '2000-01' instead of the correct '2001-2002'.
What were the facts?
This is a corrigendum to a previous order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench 'B'. The original order was dated 05/09/2008 and pertained to ITA No. 6706/M/2005.
What were the issues?
Rectification of assessment year in the order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
CORRIGENDUM In the order, dated 05/09/2008, passed by Mumbai Bench ‘B’ of the 1. Tribunal in the assessment year has been incorrectly mentioned as ‘2000-01’ instead of ‘2001-2002’. The said mistake is hereby rectified by way of the present corrigendum and the Assessment Year mentioned as ‘2000-01’ in the cause title and on the first paragraph on the first page of the order, dated 05/09/2008, shall stand replaced by and be read as ‘2001-2002’.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026