SURESH KUMAR GUPTA,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that a common approval was granted for nine assessees, which vitiated the entire assessment. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal concluded that such a combined Section 153D approval was invalid.
What were the facts?
The appeals arise from orders for Assessment Year 2019-20, challenging assessments framed under Section 153A read with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The primary issue concerns the validity of the approval granted by the prescribed authority under Section 153D.
What were the issues?
Whether a common approval under Section 153D for multiple assessees vitiates the assessment. Validity of assessments framed consequent to a search action where a combined approval was obtained.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar597 citing163 Taxmann.com 9 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.500 citing163 Taxmann.com 118 · 2024 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwal
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Asstt. Year : 2019-20 Suresh Kumar Gupta, Vs DCIT, 62, East Delhi, Shiv Puri, Central Circle, New Delhi-110051 Ghaziabad (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AEMPG5026J : Asstt. Year : 2019-20 Pradeep Gupta, Vs DCIT, 62, East Delhi, Shiv Puri, Central Circle, New Delhi-110051 Ghaziabad (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. ADYPG9996Q Assessee by : Sh. Mayank Patawari, Adv. & Sh. Akash Ojha, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. Mahesh Kumar, CIT-DR Date of Hearing: 16.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 16.12.2025 ORDER Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member: These twin assessee’s appeals & 4126/Del/2024, for Assessment Year 2019-20, arise against the CIT(A)-3, Noida’s DIN & order Nos. ITBA/APL/M/250/2024- 25/1066921155(1) & 1066922407(1) dated 23.07.2024, in proceedings u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), respectively.
Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused.
We next note that there arises the first and foremost issue of validity of the impugned twin assessments framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Act; dated 24.06.2021, in consequence to the search action herein dated 30.07.2018 on the ground that the learned prescribed authority had not accorded a valid approval thereto u/s 153D of the Act.
It is in this factual backdrop that we admit the assessees’ identical legal ground and note with the able assistance coming from both the parties that the learned Assessing Officer had sought the prescribed authority’s approval dated 14.06.2021. The clinching fact emanating from the approval letter is that the learned Assessing Officer herein had infact been granted a common approval for nine assessees (assessment years from 2013-14 to 2019-20) which stood granted, and therefore, we quote PCIT Vs. Shiv Kumar Nayyar (2024) 163 taxmann.com 9 (Del.), PCIT Vs. MDLR Hotels (P) Ltd. (2024) 166 taxmann.com 327 (Del.) and ACIT vs. Serajuddin and Co. (2024) 163 taxmann.com 118 (SC), to conclude that such a combined section 153D approval indeed vitiates the entire assessment itself. We draw strong support therefrom to quash the impugned assessments framed herein in assessee’s case in assessment year 2019-20 in very terms.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026