PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that additions under Section 68 for donations are unsustainable. However, the party is not entitled to Section 13A benefits due to non-compliance. The AO is directed to treat 6% of total donations as 'income from other sources'.
What were the facts?
A political party's income was reassessed under Section 147, with the AO adding Rs. 19,15,269/- under Section 68 as unexplained cash credits, alleging they were not substantiated donations. The party claimed these were exempt donations under Section 13A but failed to meet its stringent conditions.
What were the issues?
Whether unexplained cash credits in a political party's account can be added under Section 68 when they are claimed as exempt donations under Section 13A, and if so, what is the consequence of non-compliance with Section 13A requirements.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 13A,Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 56(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
P a g e | 1 8 appeals Public Political Party (AY: 2015-16 to2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, DELHI
BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA Nos. 2982 to 2985 & 2966/Del/2025 Along with S. A. Nos. 350 to 352, 357 & 356/Del/2025 (Assessment Years: 2015-16 to 2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23)
Public Political Party Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-31 804, Laxmideep Building, Room No. 343, E-2, ARA Laxmi Nagar, District Central Jhandewala Extn. Centre, East Delhi New Delhi – 110055 Delhi – 110092 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: AAAJP1293Q Appellant .. Respondent
ITA Nos. 2761, 2812 & 2813/Del/2023 Along with S.A. Nos. 353 to 355/Del/2025 (Assessment Years: 2018-19 to 2020-21) Tax (A)-30 Room No. 264, 2nd Floor, Laxmi Nagar District Centre, Laxmi Nagar E-2, ARA Centre, Delhi – 110092 Jhandewalan Extension New Delhi – 110055 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: AAAJP1293Q Appellant .. Respondent
P a g e | 2 8 appeals Public Political Party (AY: 2015-16 to2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23)
Appellant by : Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma, Adv
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026